Complete architecture document set with multi-model review remediation: - Frozen interface contracts, runtime semantics, DB schemas - Event/tool/error/provider registries - Scheduler and main agent state machines - C4 module/code views, solution architecture, baseline V1 - Multi-model review reports and joint assessment - Phase-gate remediation complete (P0/P1/P2/UX resolved) - Implementation plan with T-000A through T-045 - Reference folders kept as placeholders only
1.0 KiB
1.0 KiB
ADR-0006: Align Execution Layer With Claude Code Quality Discipline
- Status: Accepted
- Date: 2026-05-27
Context
AirCoding's usefulness depends heavily on safe, correct code modifications. The user explicitly prioritized Claude Code-level execution quality over broad but loose tool behavior.
Decision
Align execution-layer primitives with Claude Code as much as possible:
- read before edit
- exact conservative replacements
- small patches
- no unrelated refactors
- no premature abstractions
- schema-validated tool use
- permission checks before side effects
- verification before completion
- build/test/debug evidence collection
- root-cause failure diagnosis
- explicit blocker escalation for architecture/interface conflicts
Consequences
fs.edit,fs.patch,shell.run, WorkerResult, and review gates must preserve this discipline.- Codex/OpenCode may inform tool breadth/UI/runtime ideas, but not at the cost of execution quality.
- Workers should fail or block rather than guessing unsafe edits.