82f3140847
Complete architecture document set with multi-model review remediation: - Frozen interface contracts, runtime semantics, DB schemas - Event/tool/error/provider registries - Scheduler and main agent state machines - C4 module/code views, solution architecture, baseline V1 - Multi-model review reports and joint assessment - Phase-gate remediation complete (P0/P1/P2/UX resolved) - Implementation plan with T-000A through T-045 - Reference folders kept as placeholders only
31 lines
1.0 KiB
Markdown
31 lines
1.0 KiB
Markdown
# ADR-0006: Align Execution Layer With Claude Code Quality Discipline
|
|
|
|
- Status: Accepted
|
|
- Date: 2026-05-27
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
AirCoding's usefulness depends heavily on safe, correct code modifications. The user explicitly prioritized Claude Code-level execution quality over broad but loose tool behavior.
|
|
|
|
## Decision
|
|
|
|
Align execution-layer primitives with Claude Code as much as possible:
|
|
|
|
- read before edit
|
|
- exact conservative replacements
|
|
- small patches
|
|
- no unrelated refactors
|
|
- no premature abstractions
|
|
- schema-validated tool use
|
|
- permission checks before side effects
|
|
- verification before completion
|
|
- build/test/debug evidence collection
|
|
- root-cause failure diagnosis
|
|
- explicit blocker escalation for architecture/interface conflicts
|
|
|
|
## Consequences
|
|
|
|
- `fs.edit`, `fs.patch`, `shell.run`, WorkerResult, and review gates must preserve this discipline.
|
|
- Codex/OpenCode may inform tool breadth/UI/runtime ideas, but not at the cost of execution quality.
|
|
- Workers should fail or block rather than guessing unsafe edits.
|